The reading passage states that online education is a better alternative to traditional in-person learning because it provides greater accessibility, lower costs, and increased flexibility. However, the professor in the lecture disagrees, arguing that online learning has several drawbacks that make it less effective than the reading suggests. First, the reading claims that online education is more accessible because students from anywhere in the world can take courses without having to relocate or commute. However, the professor refutes this argument by pointing out that online courses require reliable internet access and technological skills. He explains that many students, especially those from low-income backgrounds or rural areas, may not have the necessary resources to participate effectively in online learning. As a result, rather than increasing accessibility, online education may actually exclude some students. Second, the reading suggests that online education is more affordable than traditional learning because it eliminates costs related to transportation, housing, and campus facilities. In contrast, the professor argues that while online courses may seem cheaper, they often lack the financial aid options available for traditional universities. He also notes that students may have to spend extra money on specialized software, high-speed internet, and upgraded computers to participate effectively in virtual classes. These hidden costs make online education less affordable than the reading implies. Finally, the reading claims that online learning is more flexible because students can study at their own pace and balance their education with work or other responsibilities. However, the professor challenges this idea by stating that online courses often lack structure, which can lead to lower student motivation and engagement. He explains that without regular face-to-face interaction with professors and classmates, students may struggle to stay disciplined and complete their coursework. Studies have shown that online students have higher dropout rates compared to those in traditional classrooms. In conclusion, while the reading passage presents online education as a superior alternative to traditional learning, the professor disagrees. He argues that accessibility issues, hidden costs, and a lack of student engagement make online learning less effective than the reading suggests.