The reading passage claims that driverless cars will soon dominate transportation because they offer increased safety, cost savings, and convenience. However, the professor in the lecture challenges these claims, arguing that autonomous vehicles still have significant drawbacks. First, the reading states that driverless cars will reduce traffic accidents because they eliminate human errors, such as distracted or reckless driving. However, the professor refutes this claim by pointing out that self-driving technology is not perfect. He explains that autonomous vehicles rely on sensors and software, which can malfunction or fail in unpredictable situations, such as extreme weather conditions. He adds that recent accidents involving self-driving cars show that they are not yet reliable enough to ensure safety on the roads. Second, the reading suggests that driverless cars will lower transportation costs because they eliminate the need for human drivers, reducing expenses for fuel, insurance, and vehicle maintenance. In contrast, the professor argues that the initial cost of driverless cars is extremely high, making them unaffordable for most consumers. He also explains that maintaining advanced AI systems and sensors requires expensive repairs, which could make these vehicles more costly in the long run. Finally, the reading claims that self-driving cars will provide greater convenience by allowing passengers to relax during travel, increasing productivity and comfort. However, the professor disagrees, stating that people may not fully trust autonomous vehicles and may feel anxious about giving up control. He explains that many drivers prefer having the ability to make decisions on the road rather than relying entirely on a machine. Furthermore, he points out that if an AI system encounters an unexpected situation, such as a malfunctioning traffic light, a human driver may need to intervene, reducing the convenience that the reading suggests. In conclusion, while the reading passage presents driverless cars as the future of transportation, the professor disagrees. He argues that self-driving technology is not yet safe enough, the high costs make them impractical, and people may not fully trust these vehicles, making their widespread adoption less likely.