The reading passage claims that artificial intelligence (AI) will soon replace human workers in various industries, resulting in increased efficiency, lower costs, and overall economic growth. However, the professor in the lecture disagrees, arguing that AI still has significant limitations and cannot fully replace human workers. First, the reading states that AI-driven machines can perform tasks faster and more accurately than humans, eliminating the need for human labor in many fields. However, the professor refutes this claim by explaining that AI lacks critical thinking and creativity. He points out that while AI can handle repetitive tasks efficiently, it struggles with complex decision-making that requires human judgment. As a result, many jobs that involve problem-solving and innovation will continue to require human workers. Second, the reading suggests that AI will reduce labor costs for businesses, allowing companies to invest more in other areas of economic growth. In contrast, the professor argues that widespread AI adoption could lead to job losses, creating economic instability. He explains that if too many jobs are replaced by AI, unemployment rates could rise, reducing consumer spending and ultimately harming the economy rather than helping it. Finally, the reading claims that AI will improve overall productivity and allow businesses to operate more efficiently. However, the professor challenges this idea by stating that AI systems are not perfect and can make mistakes, especially in situations requiring human empathy and ethical considerations. He provides an example of AI in healthcare, where automated diagnosis systems might overlook important patient details that a human doctor would catch. This demonstrates that AI is not yet reliable enough to replace humans in critical fields. In conclusion, while the reading passage argues that AI will soon replace human workers and benefit the economy, the professor disagrees. He contends that AI lacks creativity, could lead to job losses, and is not yet capable of handling tasks that require ethical judgment and human intuition.