According to the complainant, such notice dated was duly served upon the petitioners, however, same was never replied/responded. On bidding to pay the arrears of due revenue share and to hand over the vacant possession of the sublease premises, petitioners staeted to misbehave with the complainant and not only abused, but threatened to kill and openly challenged the complainant to do anything. Under such compelling circumstances, the complainant was forced to lodge the impugned FIR on leveling as allegation against petitioners that they had an intention to deceit the complainant since inception having no intention to make payment of their revenue share. Allegations have been leveled in the FIR that petitioners got possession of the disputed property, with a malice intention to detain the possession dishonestly. It has been submitted that petitioners are giving threat to kill the complainant and their whole action since inception to last, is collusive as much as fraudulent. Arrears of revenue, upto the period of 31.07.2023, have been accumulated more than Rs.77 lakhs, which have not been paid, nor the possession of the disputed property has been handed over despite repeated requests, therefore, stern action be taken against the petitioners, who are cheaters and defaulters. Learned counsel for complainant has drawn attention of this Court, to one additional registered on 24.10.2023 at Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar by the management of one another Hotel Tokus locate nearby, against persons presently holding the management and charge of Hotel Rajwada Darbar, in order to show tat as a matter of fact, petitioners have handed over the charge, management and possession of Hotel Rajwada to some anti-social elements, who are used to taking the law in their own hands. Learned counsel contended that the accused petitioners, from the start had a fraudulent and dishonest intention to enter into agreements with complainant, so also induced the complainant deceitfully to hand ober the possession of premises to them. Petitioners are prima facie guilty for committing offence of cheating and to misappropriate the property of complainant dishonestly, hence in totality of facts and circumstances, a clear case for commission of offences