the same day the plaintiff forwarded the required information through email by way of attachment. On 30.09.2016, the 1st defendant issued untenable reply by categorically denying the averments of legal notice and the 1 st defendant requested the counsel of the plaintiff to meet its representative with view to settle th matter amicably, which is contrary to the other paragraphs of the reply. On the plaintiff got issued rejoinder to the defendants. The 1 st defendant company replied on 23.11.2016 conveying that joint meeting has been orgainzed on 29.11.2016. On the said joint meeting, the defendants requested the plaintiff to provide couple of days to clarify their accounts. Thereafter once again the plaintiff got issued rejoinder. The defendant company responded to the same by denying categorically the contents of the said rejoinder. The brief facts of the prosecution case is that the complainant and accused No.1 were in love, as on 29.4.2019 a female child is born out of relationship between victim and accused no.1. The accused No.1 and the victim both were classmates of first Year and Second Year academic year. The accused No.1 was behaving in a very close with the victim, even though victim tried to avoid the accused No.1, he by behaving in differently and mentioned is in love with her while they were in Second Year PUC, accused mentioned he will marry her, as such he took her to hotel, park and when the victim told she belongs to schedule caste and if the parents of the accused refused to marry the life will be spoiled. Even after telling this accused did not left the victim, he forced her to believe and he gave explanation he is the only son to his parent and as they are belonging to 'Badagi caste' he will convince his parents to take the victim in marriage. The accused No.1 once took to his parents and mentioned she is only daughter of her parents, both are working in Government job. The accused No.1 on coming to now that victim parents used to be out of the house from morning till evening