eng
competition

Text Practice Mode

Mynotes_247 MP HIGH COURT JJA ENGLISH TYPING MOCK TEST 9*

created Nov 20th, 09:47 by Anamika Shrivastava


2


Rating

352 words
29 completed
00:00
It is noteworthy that the petitioner-victim approached this Court by way of Criminal Appeal of 2019 seeking just and adequate compensation for her ordeals. This Court vide order date 23.04.2019 observed that the petitioner is a victim of riots which occurred in the aftermath of the Godhra train burning. This Court noted that the petitioner's case had to be dealt with differently as the loss she has suffered surpassed normal cases. That the gruesome and horrific acts of violence had left an indelible imprint on the mind of the petitioner, which will continue to torment an cripple her. This Court therefore directed the State Government to paycommitted gang rape on other women. Thi police officer. Somabhai Gori was convicted of the offence punishable under Sections 217 and 218 of the IPC. a Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay passed an Order in Criminal Writ Petition titled Ramesh Rupabhai Chandana vs. Against the judgment of the Trial Court dated 21.01.2008, the persons convicted, as well as the State filed Criminal Appeals before the Bombay High Court. While the convicts filed criminal appeals assailing their conviction, the State filed criminal appeal against acquittal of the police officials and the doctors A bench comprising Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar and Mrs. V. K. Tahilramani, JJ. of the Bombay High Court upheld the conviction of the eleven persons accused of the offence of rioting armed with deadly weapons, gang-rape and murder by judgment titled Jashwa Chaturbhai Nai vs. State of Gujarat. The five police officials and the two doctors who were acquitted by the Trial Court were also convicted by the High Court. The High Court also observed that the investigation by the Gujarat police was not proper and that the Gujarat police had taken the investigation in the wrong direction from the beginning i.e., the day of registering the FIR. That the investigation was not only unsatisfactory but it also smacked of dishonest steps to shield the culprits. It was further observed that the earlier investigation had played the role of a villain in the case. The Court while going through the evidence also
 

saving score / loading statistics ...