eng
competition

Text Practice Mode

ROHIT TYPING CENTER (RTC) CHAKIYA RAJROOPUR PRAYAGRAJ U.P Allahabad High Court RO,ARO, 500 word english contact: 8299289045

created Nov 28th 2021, 01:59 by rohittyping2


5


Rating

513 words
51 completed
00:00
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
AFR
Court No. - 5
 
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 246 of 2020
Appellant :- Sana Afrin
Respondent :- Zohaib Khan
Counsel for Appellant :- Mohammad Umar Khan
Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar Pandey
 
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
(Per : Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)0151—
1. Heard Sri Mohammad Umar Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent.—
2. The present first appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 19841 has been preferred against an order dated 01.10.2020 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Nagar in Case No.63 of 2020 (Zohaib Khan v Sana Afrin), whereby the application (paper no.6ga) filed by opposite party no.2 under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 18902 has been allowed.” 87.87.78725625=-098
3. At the very outset an objection was taken with regard to the maintainability of the appeal filed under Section 19 of the Act, 1984 on the ground that the order under Section 12 of the Act, 1890 is in the nature of an interlocutory order and an appeal would not lie against such interlocutory orders.%%%@@
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties on the question of maintainability of the present appeal and have perused the records.0987  
5. It would be worthwhile to take notice of the fact that proceedings under Section 25 of the Act, 1890 were initiated by the opposite party no.2 before the Principal Family Judge, Kanpur Nagar, registered as Case No.63 of 2020 for delivery of custody of his minor son. It was during the pendency of the aforesaid proceedings that an application (paper no.7ga) was filed under Section 12 of the Act, 1890 for making an interlocutory order for grant of visitation rights to enable the opposite party no.2 to meet the child. The aforesaid application for grant of interlocutory order under Section 12 came to be allowed in terms of the order dated 01.10.2020 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Nagar, against which the present first appeal has been preferred. 584857938
6. In order to decide the issue with regard to maintainability of the present first appeal against an order passed under Section 12 of the Act, 1890, which is of an interlocutory nature, the relevant statutory provisions may be adverted to.545454
7. The power to make an interlocutory order for production of minor and interim protection of person and property has been provided for under Section 12 of the Act, 1890 and in terms thereof the Court may direct that the person having custody of the minor shall produce him or cause him to be produced at such place and time and before such person as it appoints, and may make such order for the temporary custody and protection of the person or property of the minor as it thinks proper. A visitation right or order which is essentially an order granting visiting times for the non-costodial parent with his or her children may. /  
 

saving score / loading statistics ...