Although the original duties are criticized by critics on the basis above, this does not diminish the importance of the basic duties. These are not just pious hopes, but they have special significance, which is as follows serving citizens as a basic duty whip when they exercise their rights. Duties alert against anti-national and anti-social activities such as burning of the national flag, destroying public property, etc. The basic duties help in promoting citizens, learning discipline and as a source of commitment. They inculcate the belief that citizens are not just mute spectators but active participants in national goal acceptance. Fundamental duties assist in the constitutional validity of courts and their trial. In 1992, the Supreme Court provided that in the interpretation of the constitutionality of a law if the court finds that questions arise in the law in relation to the basic duties, then in the context of Article-14 or Article-19, these are related to justified is done. The basic duties are enforced by law. In the event of any of them not being completed or failing, Parliament can make appropriate penalties or punishment in them. The basic duties described in Part 4 of the Constitution are criticized on the following grounds The list of duties is incomplete as it does not include duties like voting, tax payment, family planning etc. The Swarna Singh Committee recommended duty of tax payment. Some duties are vague, multi-faceted and difficult for the general public to understand such as high ideals, mixed culture scientificity etc. Due to his unjustified image, he was labeled a moral order by critics. Incidentally, the Swarn Singh Committee recommended penalty and punishment for violation of basic duties.