Impressive. Congratulations. ^^
Hindi updated.
Best typist in each language
-
Varsoviejj
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:19 pm
Re: Best typist in each language
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QtEPmlLaGM
10FAST FINGERS SPANISH TYPING TEST 193 WPM
10FAST FINGERS SPANISH TYPING TEST 193 WPM
-
SlowMotion
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:22 pm
Re: Best typist in each language
Congrats Varsovie, great score.
I continue thinking that 199wpm score was something strange, and even more so seeing that you're trying and trying to do something similar, but you are certainly in the right of the current Spanish record for me 100%. I congratulate you
.
I continue thinking that 199wpm score was something strange, and even more so seeing that you're trying and trying to do something similar, but you are certainly in the right of the current Spanish record for me 100%. I congratulate you
.Re: Best typist in each language
You must admit that the difference between 193 and 199 WPM is very small (30 keystrokes).
Turkish updated.
Turkish updated.
-
SlowMotion
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:22 pm
Re: Best typist in each language
Of course I admit that. Why not? xD. It's only an opinion and I can be wrong or not. This world is free and I think you can see in my arguments always respect. I'm not saying those kind of things in an offhand manner.
And focusing about the discussion, what I meant was that I think that 199 wpm was a very strange score in that moment, could be cheat, could be lag, could be another thing or nothing, I have not the true, but seing his graphics and so on, was my impression.
Like I wrote at the begining, I admit that NOW and with "hard practice" the difference is small, but only to be more precise:
-199 wpm (0 wrong words; 1 correction)
-193 wpm (6 wrong words; 3 corrections)
The difference is about 62 keystrokes
And focusing about the discussion, what I meant was that I think that 199 wpm was a very strange score in that moment, could be cheat, could be lag, could be another thing or nothing, I have not the true, but seing his graphics and so on, was my impression.
Like I wrote at the begining, I admit that NOW and with "hard practice" the difference is small, but only to be more precise:
-199 wpm (0 wrong words; 1 correction)
-193 wpm (6 wrong words; 3 corrections)
The difference is about 62 keystrokes
Re: Best typist in each language
The "6 wrong words" were made in the 199 WPM. 
But no matter anyway, I know what's your opinion. I just wanted to highlight the fact that if he's able to make a video at 193 WPM, then see him reach 199 WPM would not be surprising, even assuming he has never done it before.
May I ask, just out of curiosity: how many WPM should he achieve in a video so you consider his 199 WPM as legit?
And don't worry, I have always considered your words as intelligent and respectful.
But no matter anyway, I know what's your opinion. I just wanted to highlight the fact that if he's able to make a video at 193 WPM, then see him reach 199 WPM would not be surprising, even assuming he has never done it before.
May I ask, just out of curiosity: how many WPM should he achieve in a video so you consider his 199 WPM as legit?
And don't worry, I have always considered your words as intelligent and respectful.
-
SlowMotion
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:22 pm
Re: Best typist in each language
Yes, you're right -> 199wpm (6 and 3); 193wpm (0 and 1) 
xD
And again yes, I agree with you, won't be a big surprise a 199wpm video. But answer your question, probably none, I have a lot doubts about that score in that time. He's spending much more time and effort now in getting these results and I assume he's capable to reach 199wpm or something very close. In the past, I don't think, it's only my point of view
By the way, nice graph that one with all your results, I want it for me!
xDAnd again yes, I agree with you, won't be a big surprise a 199wpm video. But answer your question, probably none, I have a lot doubts about that score in that time. He's spending much more time and effort now in getting these results and I assume he's capable to reach 199wpm or something very close. In the past, I don't think, it's only my point of view
By the way, nice graph that one with all your results, I want it for me!
Re: Best typist in each language
i dont know if its fastest among you guys since the test was taken in korean.
im not really familar with english type but i will try soon..
anyway heres my personal record with korean!
-.-; and i can type faster than this
not sure how fast this is since the test was taken in korean
Re: Best typist in each language
after looking at the list, i think theres some miscalculation in korean
cause i just figured no one in the list reached 300wpm except for me-_-
cause i just figured no one in the list reached 300wpm except for me-_-
Re: Best typist in each language
Hi kzya,
Yes, the scores are inflated in Korean. I explained the problem here, hoping not to be mistaken. In summary, Korean scores should be approximately halved.
Do you have a profile on 10FF? Even though I think it's currently possible to exceed the 200 or even 300 WPM in Korean (anyway, beyond 300 WPM, you're automatically banned), I also know it's very easy to create yourself an imaginary score by typing directly the result inside the URL of this screenshot so it doesn't prove anything. The best way to certify your result would be to make a video.
Yes, the scores are inflated in Korean. I explained the problem here, hoping not to be mistaken. In summary, Korean scores should be approximately halved.
Do you have a profile on 10FF? Even though I think it's currently possible to exceed the 200 or even 300 WPM in Korean (anyway, beyond 300 WPM, you're automatically banned), I also know it's very easy to create yourself an imaginary score by typing directly the result inside the URL of this screenshot so it doesn't prove anything. The best way to certify your result would be to make a video.